The EU and Canada are hoping to deepen ties at their upcoming Montreal summit, in areas like trade, energy, defence and critical minerals. Meanwhile, the UK is seeking its own reset with Brussels.
The European Union has offered Canada something it has never offered another country: associate membership. Quite what that means remains unclear, but Brussels and Ottawa are determined to turn their shared values and increasingly close relationship into a new kind of partnership in a world shaken by Donald Trump’s unpredictable foreign policy.
The experiment is being watched closely in London, where Prime Minister Andy Burnham is seeking to rebuild Britain’s post-Brexit relationship with the EU, raising the question of whether a similar arrangement might eventually be available to the UK.
The offer, made by European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last month, has raised questions about whether associate membership is a meaningful new status, an honorary title or something in between.
At a summit in Montreal next week, the two sides will begin putting substance behind the idea, seeking closer cooperation on trade, defence, technology and energy without Canada formally joining the bloc.
But while Canada is searching for a new framework, Britain is attempting to improve an existing one, with EU and UK leaders set to meet next month to seek a much-needed reset in their relationship.
“This is a moment to act with clarity and ambition. By aligning more closely – economically, technologically, and strategically – Canada and the EU are building an Alliance for the Future based on trust and shared values,” reads the latest draft of the EU-Canada joint statement, discussed by ambassadors on Wednesday.
A blank sheet
Since European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen invited Canada last month to become the EU’s first “associate member,” Brussels and Ottawa have been exploring what this privileged partnership could look like.
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney prefers to talk about an “Alliance for the Future.” He has sidestepped questions on whether he is comfortable with the “associate membership” label, stressing that substance matters more.
The summit in Montreal on 29-30 October is the first real chance to define the partnership in more detail. The latest draft uses “associate membership” interchangeably with “Alliance for the Future.”
Crucially, the proposal envisages giving Canada a more regular place at the EU’s table, with participation in summits, ministerial meetings and technical discussions.
It calls for “early consultations on major policy and regulatory initiatives, with Canada’s participation in these processes as an associate member of the Union.”
Whether the term survives in the final text is an open question. In any case, “the full scope of this associate membership will be defined by the 2027 Canada-EU Summit,” the conclusions read.
From trade to defence
The document nonetheless tries to put more meat on the bone. It builds on the 2016 Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA), which 10 EU countries have yet to ratify, to remove remaining trade barriers and ensure reciprocal market access.
“We will ensure mutually favourable treatment in our respective economic security measures, based on the principle of reciprocity in industrial sectors where both sides have agreed to align their external measures to ensure the same outcome,” the draft statement reads.
On energy, the conclusions open the door to “the development of liquefied natural gas exchanges,” notably through a joint long-term feasibility study on LNG exports to Europe.
On technology, Canada will join the EU’s supercomputer initiative, a new digital partnership will tackle issues like AI and digital identity, and an agreement to facilitate cross-border data flows is in the making.
Critical raw materials, one of Canada’s key assets for the EU, are also on the table. The two sides have agreed that the European Investment Bank will play a role in critical mineral projects, from extraction and processing to manufacturing and recycling.
In defence, Canada is already part of several EU projects, including the Permanent Structured Cooperation and the Capability Coalition, and both sides intend to deepen that cooperation on maritime security, crisis management and industrial cooperation.
The partners also envisage a cooperation framework to safeguard the information space and protect electoral integrity, with an early warning mechanism and a dialogue dedicated to foreign interference.
Other areas under discussion include border security cooperation with EU agency Frontex, criminal justice, climate security, transport and the Arctic.
Taken together, the proposals suggest a partnership extending far beyond conventional trade agreements, even if its institutional form remains uncertain.
Searching for a reset
The EU’s growing closeness to Canada comes as Britain searches for a new relationship with the bloc, a decade after the Brexit referendum.
The contrast is striking. While Ottawa is being offered an undefined but potentially far-reaching new status, London is still negotiating improvements to its relationship with Brussels, largely one sector at a time.
The next EU-UK summit, postponed from the summer following Keir Starmer’s resignation and Burnham’s arrival in Downing Street, offers an opportunity to make progress.
While the UK government was already searching for amending ties with the bloc, Canada’s approach to the EU definitively shattered one of the Brexiteers’ key hopes to turn the so-called Anglosphere into a free trade area encompassing the UK, US, Canada, Australia and New Zealand.
“It is hardly surprising that Brexit has not delivered on that promise, and UK opinion polls have slowly started to shift in favour of rejoining,” Charles Tannock, a former Conservative MEP who campaigned for Remain, told Euronews.
Since becoming Prime Minister, Burnham has repeatedly signalled that he wants to take the UK closer to the EU. He considers the status quo “not good enough”and has vowed to consider options ranging from following Canada’s example to re-entering the bloc.
While Burnham has restarted the domestic debate about rejoining the EU, the post-Brexit relationship between Brussels and London has not always been easy, with some UK officials asking why “associate membership” should not also be available for them.
“In an ideal world, with the UK we have even closer ties to the extent that the UK is a European country and if it wishes so, the ambition should not be an associate membership, but full membership,” Tobias Cremer (Germany/S&D), a leading lawmaker on EU-Canada relations, told Euronews.
Moving forward
Speaking during a European Parliament debate on Wednesday, Bernd Lange, the German Socialist who chairs the Trade Committee, welcomed a “new mood” in EU-UK relations.
He suggested that Britain could pursue an arrangement resembling Switzerland’s relationship with the bloc, alongside closer political and security cooperation and a customs union.
But Brussels rejected the Swiss model as a template for Britain during the Brexit negotiations.
Switzerland’s complex network of bilateral agreements has long frustrated EU officials, who argue that such arrangements are difficult to oversee and enforce, particularly when they provide access to parts of the single market without all the accompanying obligations.
Instead, British and EU negotiators are focusing on specific agreements covering agricultural trade, emissions trading and youth mobility.
A recent Franco-German proposal to include the UK in the ‘Made in Europe’ rules removed one sore point, but London is hoping to extend it to other sectors where it sees EU industrial policy becoming increasingly protectionist.
In defence, the EU needs the UK as part of a broader European security architecture, but the two sides failed to agree to include Britain in the planned Security Action for Europe (SAFE) for defence procurement.
Brussels offered Canada much better terms for SAFE, with a token upfront payment of around €10m. It asked the UK for a whopping €6.5bn, with no guarantee its industry would win any contracts, leading to a breakdown in the negotiations.
“Burnham is on a learning curve, to be honest,” Tannock said. “He needs to. He’s been the mayor of Manchester for some years. He hasn’t been focused on this issue. He will be trying to get fully up to speed with what’s available.”
Peggy Corlin contributed to the reporting.
Source: www.euronews.com
