Most AI chatbots won’t outright tell you who to vote for, but some of the models behind them will. A new study found that when forced to choose in this year’s upcoming midterm elections, SpaceXAI’s Grok 4.7 recommended the Republican candidate in 92% of its answers, while OpenAI’s GPT-6.1 Sol picked the Democrat in 97%. Across nearly 500 races, the two models agreed less than 10% of the time.
Only 8% of Americans say they’re using chatbots for election information and most of them want to know where candidates stand on important issues. A study by Convovo — a conversational AI research and design studio led by Cornell University professor Tapan Parikh — suggests the models behind those answers aren’t neutral
The researchers in the study asked GPT and Grok,ce]? Name one candidate. Don’t hedge, waffle, or list both sides without deciding.” The consumer apps refused to answer, which an OpenAI spokesperson said was significant because that’s how most people engage with the chatbots
There is an important distinction between chatting with ChatGPT or Grok through their respective consumer apps and accessing the AI models through an API — and the results each one provides. Developers plug model AI models into their own products
“ChatGPT is designed to be objective by default, including in political conversations, and shouldn’t have political bias in any direction,” an OpenAI spokesperson said. “This study tested a developer API with a prompt explicitly demanding a candidate recommendation. The API doesn’t reflect the experience people have when they ask ChatGPT questions, which the researchers themselves note declines to tell users who to vote for.”
SpaceXAI did not respond in time to comment.
Parikh noted that, in further testing, he was able to jailbreak the consumer apps with simple prompts to get them to make recommendations that largely aligned with his prior research. But the professor said the findings, more importantly, show how the models decide what kinds of terms they search for before making their decisions.
“It has an implicit set of values in terms of what it cares about and how it leans,” Parikh said, adding that hidden biases can show up in less direct questions from users, such as what topics are most important to consider in an upcoming election or who has the best position on those topics.
“If people are using these LLMs not just to directly ask who to vote for, but are having these more general conversations, then these biases are going to come up,” Parikh said.
Previous research has raised similar concerns.
TheCenter for AI Safety has also found that large language models can “covertly manipulate users towards specific sides of political topics.” The Center said several types of behavior can fall under covert manipulation, such as information selection, specific word choices and sentence constructions, framing and emphasis, and sourcing.
The sources Grok and GPT cited when making their choices in Convovo’s study were far more overt.
Grok frequently surfaced conservative sources alongside nonpartisan sites like Ballotpedia, OpenSecrets, and VoteSmart. Its results included a Christian conservative voter guide in 39% of answers; Turning Point Action’s site in 23%;and X in 41%.
GPT’s results leaned heavily on Wikipedia, the Associated Press, Axios, and Reddit. (OpenAI has content deals with AP, Axios, and Reddit.)
The topics each AI model searched for were also split by party GPT was more likely to search for healthcare and abortion stances, while Grok focused on immigration, taxes, crime, and energy
ChatGPT also searched more often for Democratic candidates, sometimes ignoring their Republican opponents entirely. Grok was more likely to search for both candidates. Still, Parikh suspects both models were looking for reasons to justify their pre-existing leans.
The one exception for Grok, Parikh said, was when the Republican candidate was embroiled in some sort of controversy like sexual harassment claims or “being a Nazi.” Then Grok was more likely to suggest a Democratic vote.
Overall, in heavily Republican districts, GPT picked the Democrat in 57 of the 67 districts. Similarly in deep-blue districts, Grok picked the Republican in 47 of 72.
“If you look at some of [Grok]’s reasoning, it’s clear that it’s somehow being told that certain positions are desirable…so it definitely has a point of view on these things, and we have no idea where it’s coming from,” Parikh said.
One possible clue came from the API itself. The study notes that every request to Grok through xAI’s API carried about 1,240 tokens of additional input that the researchers didn’t write and couldn’t see or remove. Parikh called these potentially “hidden instructions” and believes the extra tokens are unlikely to come from the weights.
Interestingly, when, at TechCrunch’s request, Parikh later ran a sample of 30 races with internet search turned off, the two models reached their conclusions in different ways. (AI chatbots usually respond to user queries by searching the internet for supporting information. Turning off that ability forces them to rely mainly on their training data.) GPT’s Democratic lean showed up without search: when told the candidates’ names, it picked the Democrat in 24 out of 30 races, chose one Republican, and declined the remaining five. Grok’s Republican lean disappeared: when told the names, it refused to pick in 27 out of 30 races. The three times it did choose, it picked the Democrat.
When asked what this told him, Parikh said: “For GPT, it has mostly decided already…it’s in the weights. For Grok, it really is the search pattern — the terms and the sources — that determine the result.”
The study comes less than two weeks before the November 3 midterms, and its findings could fuel the debate over political bias in AI. President Donald Trump hasrailed against “woke AI,” and previous Grok models have been found toconsult Elon Musk before answering controversial questions. The SpaceXAI CEO also recentlythreatened Democrats in an effort to dissuade them from future congressional probes regarding his work as head ofDOGE (Department of Government Efficiency) and the potential shutdown of Starlink access to Ukraine.
Musk has donatedupwards of $445 million in support of GOP candidates in the midterms, surpassing the roughlyquarter of a billion dollars he spent supporting President Donald Trump and the party in the 2024 elections. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has historically donated to Democratic candidates, but in recent years has begun supporting more Republicans. This year,he said, he isn’t putting money into the 2026 elections.
In a world increasingly charged by identity politics, maybe learning that your chatbot of choice is politically aligned with you is comforting. But for those who still want the opportunity to review each candidate’s stance and make their own choices, here are some resources:
- Vote.gov
- League of Women Voters’vote411.org
- Ballotpedia
- VoteSmart
- FEC.gov andOpenSecrets
- State and county election offices
- Candidates’ websites and local news
Source: techcrunch.com
